Once Jacob is accused, Andy is relieved of his duties at the
DA’s office for the duration of the investigation and trial that will surely
follow. Neal Logiudice (la-JOO-dis), a prosecutor who wants Andy’s job, is now the
prosecutor on the Ben Rifkin murder case and it appears that he will stop at
nothing to find Jacob Barber guilty and Andy guilty by association.
The book jumps back and forth between the investigation and
trial of the murder and a Grand Jury session where Prosecutor Logiudice is
questioning ex-Assistant DA Andy Barber.
We do not know what crime the Grand Jury has been convened to determine whether
to indict, however, this was a very effective way to inform the reader there
was much more going on than the trial of Jacob Barber.
The author’s cleverness in unfolding the story of the
investigation and trial will lead you to vacillate between Jacob’s guilt and
his innocence, and the Grand Jury sessions, even though not part of the Ben
Rifkin murder trial, contribute to the vacillation. However, Andy never waivers
from belief in his son’s innocence even as evidence mounts. When shocking revelations about Jacob surface,
and Andy is forced to confront his own past, one that he was so effective in
hiding from his family as well as himself, does he consider perhaps he might
somehow have failed is son.
Defending Jacob is a gripping story, one that I could not put down and
caused me to go to work with tired eyes from staying up late reading. Highly recommended.
(Previously posted March 2012)
(Previously posted March 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment